WORLD

조회 수 165 추천 수 0 댓글 0
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

uuuuuuuuuu43rt.jpg

 

Heresy Judgement and Criteria

 

What are the criteria for judging heresy?

 

What are the criteria for judging heresy?

 

The topic of 'heresy' is a hot potato within the Christian community in Korea. Recently, numerous Christian groups have grappled with heresy issues. The Church carries the grave responsibility of discerning heresy and condemning it. 

 

Above all, the legitimacy of the criteria and authority for judging heresy need to be clearly defined. In this regard, examining the history of dissent can help us understand heresy and serve as a good guide for building a sound Christian faith.

 

The mission of the Church to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ demands a persistent attitude toward heresy. However, heresy condemnation can harm faithful Christians due to its unwavering nature. 

 

Church history attests that the biases and misjudgments of powerful church groups have inflicted terrible harm upon the children of God, whom Christ redeemed through His shed blood.

 

The Church has historically condemned orthodox Christians as heretics. Prominent figures who suffered include Athanasius, Peter Waldo, John Wycliffe, Jan Hus, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Thomas Cranmer, and more. Professor Gresham Machen in the United States and reverend Joo Ki-Chul in Korea were "great heretics."

 

The heresy condemnation within denominational systems is even more precarious. Some heresy inquisitions performed as the oppression of groups that have seized church power. What one group labels as heretics, another group may not. The motivations and criteria for heresy judgment within the Church do not align.

 

In 2016, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Korea (Tonghap) declared amnesty for four individuals the Church had previously condemned as heretics. They initially announced judgment in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit but later revoked it due to public criticism. They made heresy judgments in the name of the triune God and revoked them because of public pressure. 

 

Such events undermine the Church's authority tasked with the duty of heresy condemnation and promote a "heresy condemnation futility" within the Church. This case suggests that heresy condemnation continues unjustly today.

 

The Korean Society of Christianity and the Korean Evangelical Society, both academic and theological societies, held a joint conference on "heresy" 2014 in Seoul. Theologians presented ten academic papers on the theme. The author presented an article titled "Medieval Church Heresy Condemnation: Self-Righteousness and Reciprocal Opposition."

 

The author confirmed on that day that there was an indulgent attitude toward alleged heretics among progressive theologians and those in the evangelical tradition. They were critical of the Church's politically motivated heresy judgment and condemnation. One New Testament scholar from Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Seoul(Tonghap group), who presented the paper that day, emphasized various Christian sects and so-called heresies even within the New Testament.

 

The theologians of the academic conference seriously consider the limits of human understanding and acknowledge the diversity of theology and biblical interpretation. They maintain a humble scholarly attitude, despise the Church's careless condemnation, and reject heresy condemnation motivated by politics rather than truth. They cautioned against the activities of hasty "heresy discerners" or "heresy judgers" who lack prudence.

 

The following year, the author presented an academic paper titled "John Wesley's Tolerance of Heresy" at the Korean Evangelical Society(2015). The theologians who attended the conference were concerned about the trend of heresy judgment within and around the Church carelessly. They criticized the activities of "heresy discerners" or "heresy judgers" who had lost control.

 

The author's reflections on tolerance toward heresy and attitude led to the following five considerations:

 

First, criteria. It is essential to have clear measuring standards for what is orthodox and why someone is heresy.

 

Second, a firm understanding of the subject of heresy discernment. Does any church have the authority to discern and condemn those outside their group or members of other denominations as heretics based on specific criteria?

 

It is thirdly recognizing that there may be "heretical" groups or "heretics" who have been labeled unfairly as such in and around the Korean Church. There is a need for self-reflection on the part of churches that have condemned "saved heretics," Christians who are children of God.

 

Fourth, there is a need for inter-denominational heresy judgment bodies such as a "Council of Theologians." A council of scholars with academic rigor and unity can enhance the credibility of the Church's heresy discernment.

 

Fifth, when a heresy condemnation reflects a misjudgment, the Church that issued the judgment should compensate the victims or victimized groups. Seeking forgiveness and expressing a mutual commitment to serve as part of the universal body of Christ is necessary.

 

Heresy discernment and condemnation driven by church power and the group's self-protection motives are unjust. Only heresy judgment for protecting God's special revelation, that is, the Bible, the truth of salvation, and the gospel of Jesus Christ, is legitimate. The criteria for heresy discernment are the Bible and truthfulness.

 

Whose duty is to discern or judge the heresy? Is it the Church as an organization? Is the condemnation of prominent heretics and the excommunication of Protestant reformers by the Roman Catholic Church, done with absolute authority, just? Who has 'the authority' to judge the orthodoxy and heresy of individuals, communities, and church groups?

 

The Church has the power and authority to judge and condemn. Is the Church's power and authority to condemn heresy unconditional and absolute? Empathy is unnecessary for officially recognized heretics who have historically deviated from Christian orthodoxy and heretics. There is no need to show concern for groups with no intention of correcting their errors.

 

Our concern should be for the "saved heretics," Christians who are children of God. These fellow Christians are ostracized as heretics for political reasons, minor mistakes, or ignorance, even though they do not seriously deviate from the Bible and the truth. Because of the firmness of heresy condemnation, "saved heretics" suffer because of their political isolation and exclusion by the Church.

 

The modern era expects to care for socially weak persons. Nevertheless, are there no "great heretics" or "saved heretics" who suffer from the Church's "oppression" within and around the Church today? A profound discussion on the criteria and who has the authority to judge heresy is more urgent now than ever.

 

 

 

Rev. Doug Choi, Ph.D., President of Peniel Theological Seminary, Busan, Korea

 

 


  1. Harris accepted for the presidential candidate

    Harris accepted the presidential candidate U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has officially accepted the Democratic Party's nomination for the presidential candidate. On August 22, 2024 (local time), Vice President Kamala Harris, the De...
    Date2024.08.23 Views140
    Read More
  2. Brave Iranian women Refused Hijab

    Brave Iranian women Refused Hijab An Iranian woman who refused to wear a hijab received 74 lashes as punishment. A 33-year-old Iranian woman in Tehran who refused to wear a hijab has reportedly received 74 lashes as punishment. The UK newsp...
    Date2024.01.09 Views148
    Read More
  3. Gregorio de Cespedes, Collaborator of Intangible Combat Power

    Gregorio de Cespedes, Collaborator of Intangible Combat Power Gregorio de Cespedes(1551–1611), a Roman Catholic priest of Spanish origin who was active in Japan, was a collaborator (附逆者) who enhanced intangible combat power for Cat...
    Date2023.12.29 Views158
    Read More
  4. The French Revolution and the American Revolution

    The French Revolution and the American Revolution The American Revolution of 1776 proclaimed freedom as the recognition of the Creator God. However, the French Revolution 1789 shouted freedom as opposition beyond denying the Creator God. Th...
    Date2023.12.23 Views175
    Read More
  5. What We Don't Have

    What We Do'nt Have One day a very wealthy father took his son on a trip to the country for the sole purpose of showing his son how it was to be poor. They spent a few days and nights on the farm of what would be considered a very poor f...
    Date2023.11.15 Views157
    Read More
  6. The European 68 Revolution and Sexual Infidelity

    The European 68 Revolution and Sexual Infidelity The European '68 revolution brought about a new society. It changed people's thought structures, from spouses, children, neighbors, and the nation to the thinking, lives, and faith of...
    Date2023.11.09 Views171
    Read More
  7. The Background of the Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

    The Background of the Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict The conflict between Israel and Hamas is not a new one. There have been armed clashes in 2008, 2012, 2014, and 2022. From Israel's perspective, the current conflict needs to be appro...
    Date2023.10.30 Views160
    Read More
  8. Pietism is the Cornerstone of Lliberal Theology

    Pietism is the Cornerstone of Lliberal Theology. The 17th century's German Pietism was the cornerstone of liberal theology in Germany. It was a pioneering movement in modern liberal theology, emphasizing religious experience and spiritu...
    Date2023.10.28 Views236
    Read More
  9. Heresy Judgement and Criteria

    Heresy Judgement and Criteria What are the criteria for judging heresy? What are the criteria for judging heresy? The topic of 'heresy' is a hot potato within the Christian community in Korea. Recently, numerous Christian groups hav...
    Date2023.10.25 Views165
    Read More
  10. Is Jesus a Bodhisattva?

    Is Jesus a Bodhisattva? The renowned religious scholar Dr. Kim Hee-sung, who passed away recently and taught at Seoul National University and Sogang University, left a book titled "Jesus Bodhisattva" (2004). In Buddhism, a bodhisattva is a ...
    Date2023.10.21 Views263
    Read More
  11. 왜 고신교회인가?

    왜 고신교회인가? 고신교회의 계승과 도전, 최덕성 박사 왜 고신교회인가?, 제2차 고신포럼 (20200217, 프레지덴트호텔 서울), 최덕성 박사의 논문 발표, "고신교회의 계승과 도전" 영상이다. 고신교회의 정체성과 존재의의를 개혁교회론의 틀로 분석한다. 한...
    Date2020.03.08 Views1521
    Read More
  12. 로마가톨릭교회는 참 교회인가?

    로마가톨릭교회는 참 교회인가? 로마가톨릭교회와 프로테스탄트교회, 천주교회와 개신교회는 현 상태로 결합할 수 있는가? 천주교와 개신교 교리의 차이는 무엇인가? 두 교회는 형제인가? 교황 프란치스코의 방한을 계기로 리포르만다(기독교사상연구원), 개...
    Date2020.03.07 Views914
    Read More
  13. 기독교 초자연주의, 도올의 사이비 기독교

    기독교 초자연주의, 도올의 사이비 기독교 기독교 초자연주의, 리포르만다 제12차 학술회 '도올 김용옥과 사이비 기독교' 제3 발제, 최덕성 박사(리포르만다 대표, 브니엘신학교 총장). 도올과 추종자들이 추구하는 기독교는 사이비 기독교이다. 기독...
    Date2019.11.05 Views2149
    Read More
  14. 도올 김용옥의 사이비 복음서, 이영진 박사

    도올 김용옥의 사이비 복음서, 이영진 박사, 도올의 사이비 성경론 리포르만다 제12차 학술회 '도올 김용옥과 사이비 기독교' 제2발제. 발제자 이영진 박사(호서대학교 교수). 도올은 역사적 기독교가 신봉해 온 성경관 파괴에 도전한다. 영지주의와 ...
    Date2019.10.19 Views2302
    Read More
  15. 도올 김용옥의 하나님, 성경의 하나님

    도올 김용옥의 하나님 vs 성경의 하나님, 도올의 사이비 신론 리포르만다 제12차 학술회 '도올 김용옥과 사이비 기독교' 제1 발제자 박명룡 박사(충주서문교회 목사). 도올의 하나님은 중국의 일원론적 신관에 기초한 사이비 신관이다. 도올이 말하는...
    Date2019.10.18 Views2478
    Read More
  16. 도올 김용옥과 사이비 기독교

    도올 김용옥과 사이비 기독교 도올 김용옥 박사의 기독교 관련 주장들은 그리스도의 회에 심대한 부정적 영향을 미치고 있다. 기독교사상연구원 리포르만다 대표 최덕성 박사가 제12차 학술회를 '도올 김용옥과 사이비 기독교'라는 주제로 개최하는 ...
    Date2019.10.17 Views1686
    Read More
  17. 사회주의를 버려라

    사회주의를 버려라 정일권 박사와 최덕성 박사의 대담
    Date2019.10.06 Views2953
    Read More
  18. WCC, NCCK, 종교다원주의

    WCC, NCCK, 종교다원주의 정동수 목사 (인천사랑침례교회)
    Date2019.07.17 Views1963
    Read More
  19. 고소, 해야 하나 말아야 하나

    고소, 해야 하나 말아야 하나 최덕성 박사 (브니엘신학교 총장) 리포르만다(기독교사상연구원) 제11차 학술회(2018.12.06.) 논문발표 "박윤선의 건덕론과 송상석의 방임불가론: 국가법정 소송에 대한 신학충돌" 기독인 간의 법정 소송, 신학자 박윤선은 목회...
    Date2018.12.16 Views4657
    Read More
  20. 한번 구원, 영원한 구원

    한번 구원, 영원한 구원 권연경 교수(숭실대)와 김철홍 교수(장신대)의 논의는 이신칭의 교리가 정당하다는 김철홍 교수의 주장이 타당하다는 결론으로 끝맺는다.
    Date2018.11.30 Views3234
    Read More
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 Next
/ 2